|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王小芹,王 晖,刘晓慧,等.宫颈上皮内瘤变患者LEEP术后宫颈粘连的相关因素分析[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2019,(06):616-619.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2019.06.017]
 WANG Xiaoqin,WANG Hui,LIU Xiaohui,et al.Relevant Factors Analysis of Cervical Adhesion in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia after LEEP[J].Ningxia Medical University,2019,(06):616-619.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2019.06.017]
点击复制

宫颈上皮内瘤变患者LEEP术后宫颈粘连的相关因素分析(PDF)
分享到:

《宁夏医科大学学报》[ISSN:1005-8486/CN:64-1029/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
616-619
栏目:
经验交流
出版日期:
2019-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relevant Factors Analysis of Cervical Adhesion in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia after LEEP
文章编号:
1674-6309(2019)06-0616-04
作者:
王小芹 王 晖 刘晓慧 肖 红
(阜阳市人民医院妇产科,阜阳 236000)
Author(s):
WANG Xiaoqin WANG Hui LIU Xiaohui XIAO Hong
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Fuyang People’s Hospital,Fuyang 236000,China)
关键词:
宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈环形电切术宫颈粘连
Keywords:
cervical intraepithelial neoplasialoop electrosurgical excision procedurecervical adhesion
分类号:
R737.33
DOI:
10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2019.06.017
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 探讨影响宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)患者宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)后宫颈粘连的因素。方法 选择2015年10月至2017年12月在我院例接受LEEP治疗的宫颈CIN的患者,依据有无宫颈粘连分为观察组(发生宫颈粘连患者53例)和对照组(无宫颈粘连患者100例)。记录手术时间、出血量、并发症情况及术后随访情况,进行多因素Logistic回归分析。结果 观察组患者年龄[(37.4±8.72)岁]、切除深度≥15mm(62.26%)、术中出血(15.09%)及术后感染(16.98%)发生率均显著均高于对照组(P<0.05);Logistic回归显示年龄(偏大)、切除深度(≥15mm)和术后感染是宫颈粘连的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论 年龄、切除深度、术后感染是CIN患者LEEP术后发生宫颈粘连的危险因素,在临床上注意规范LEEP操作、积极预防感染能够有效较少宫颈粘连的风险,提高预后。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the factors affecting cervical adhesion in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) after loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP). Methods Patients with CIN treated with LEEP in our hospital from October 2015 to December 2017 were selected. They were divided into observation group(53 cases of cervical adhesion) and control group(100 cases without cervical adhesion) according to cervical adhesion. The operation time,bleeding volume,complications and postoperative follow-up was recorded, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results The ratio of age [(37.4±8.72)years old] and resection depth (≥15mm)(62.26%),the incidence of intraoperative bleeding (15.09%) and postoperative infection(16.98%) in observation group was significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Logistic regression showed that age (older),resection depth(≥15mm) and postoperative infection were risk factors for cervical adhesion (P<0.05).Conclusion Age,resection depth and postoperative infection are risk factors for cervical adhesion in patients with CIN after LEEP. In clinical practice,attention should be paid to standardizing LEEP operation,and active prevention of infection can effectively reduce the risk of cervical adhesion and improve the prognosis.

参考文献/References:

[1] Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002[J]. Int J Cancer, 2006,118(12):3030-3044.
[2] 周晖,卢淮武,彭永排,等. 《2015年NCCN宫颈癌临床实践指南》解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2015,31(3):185-191.
[3] 钱菊芬,陶爱群. 宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变疗效比较[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2013,21(4):263-265.
[4] 李莉,耿力,郭艳利,等. 液基薄片细胞学检查在宫颈癌筛查中的应用[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志,2007,8(2):93-95.
[5] 陈昕华,虞永麟. 宫颈HPV感染、CIN及宫颈癌3年发生情况分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2011,26(13): 1945-1946.
[6] 阳霞,钱德英,陈观娣,等. 不同LEEP术式对年轻CINⅡ~Ⅲ患者术后病变残留/复发及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2012,28(11):1816-1818.
[7] 宋锐. 宫颈环形电切术史对妊娠分娩方式及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 航空航天医学杂志,2019,30(1): 7-9.[万方]
[8] 额尔敦达古拉. 不同宫颈锥切方法治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级的疗效评价[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2017,5(14):97-98.
[9] 刘纪昀,易韦,于燕妮,等. IMP3、P16在宫颈上皮内瘤变及浸润性癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2014,29(11):1752-1755.
[10] 贾海军,叶君,郭海雁,等. 宫颈环形电切术后再行腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的时机选择及经验总结[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,10(10):74-77.
[11] Cheng XD,Feng Y,Wang XY,et al. The effectiveness of conization treatment for post-menopausal women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Exp Ther Med,2013,5(1):185-188.
[12] 周伟,周毅惠,刘江丽,等. 210例CIN Ⅲ行LEEP及全子宫切除术后病理分析[J]. 皖南医学院学报,2017,36(1):77-79.
[13] 胡淑霞,梅丽,王志慧,等. 宫颈锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2015, 30(6):960-962.
[14] 王宁宁,花茂方. 子宫颈环形电切术及冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变2~3级效果比较[J]. 江苏大学学报(医学版),2014,24(4):355-358.
[15] Boulanger JC,Gondry J,Verhoest P,et al.Treatment of CIN after menopause[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2001,95(2):175-180.
[16] Suh-Burgmann EJ,Whall-Strojwas D,Chang Y,et al.Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2000,96(5):657-660.
[17] Santesso N,Mustafa RA,Wiercioch W,et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy,LEEP,and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2016,132(3):266-271.
[18] 李风艳,郭晶,王朝霞,等. 宫颈环形电切术术后宫颈粘连影响因素分析及预防研究[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,10(8):26-29.

相似文献/References:

[1]张文莉,孙 萍,宋佳卉,等.1895例社区妇女乳头瘤病毒感染状况与危险因素分析[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2018,(08):948.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2018.08.020]
[2]李亚萍,叶新梅,徐永辉,等.薄层液基细胞学和宫颈人乳头瘤病毒联合检测在宫颈癌筛查中的应用[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2017,(12):1465.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2017.12.030]
[3]金红岩.宫腔镜宫颈锥切术与冷刀宫颈锥切术治疗CINⅢ级的疗效比较[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2015,(05):578.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2015.05.029 ]
[4]罗金萍,车淑梅,党燕,等.宫颈ASC-H患者的临床诊断与处理[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2015,(11):1363.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2015.11.038 ]
[5]张久存,刘芳,翟建英,等.100例宫颈上皮内瘤变电切术前术后的病理对比[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2008,(02):221.
[6]李向红,哈灵侠,赵媛霞,等.子宫颈环形电切术在子宫颈上皮内瘤变诊断和治疗中的应用[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2009,(06):764.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-12-15
作者简介:王小芹(1984-),女,学士,主治医师,从事宫颈疾病研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-30