|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈 振,梁思敏,马 荣,等.Wiltse入路与后正中入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎间盘疾病的疗效比较[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,(09):975-979.
 CHEN Zhen,LIANG Simin,MA Rong,et al.Comparative Study of Lumbar Interbody Fusion between Wiltse Approach and Traditional Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases[J].Ningxia Medical University,2013,(09):975-979.
点击复制

Wiltse入路与后正中入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎间盘疾病的疗效比较(PDF)
分享到:

《宁夏医科大学学报》[ISSN:1005-8486/CN:64-1029/R]

卷:
期数:
2013年09期
页码:
975-979
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Study of Lumbar Interbody Fusion between Wiltse Approach and Traditional Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
作者:
陈 振1 梁思敏1 马 荣1 张惠勇1 马宗军2 吴 鹏2
1.宁夏医科大学,银川 750004; 2.宁夏医科大学总医院骨科,银川 750004
Author(s):
CHEN Zhen1 LIANG Simin1 MA Rong1 ZHANG Huiyong1 MA Zongjun2 WU Peng2 SUO Zhigang2 DING Xiaoli2 DING Huiqiang2 GE Zhaohui2
1.Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004; 2.The General Hospital of Ningxia Med. Univ.,Yinchuan 750004
关键词:
退变性腰椎间盘疾病 微创 Wiltse 入路 椎间融合术
Keywords:
lumbar degenerative diseases minimally invasive wiltse approach interbody fusion
分类号:
R681.5
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较Wiltse入路与后正中入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎间盘疾病的疗效。方法 将手术适应症明确的42例单节段退变性腰椎间盘疾病连续病例随机分为两组,其中Wiltse入路组22例在自行设计拉钩辅助下,行经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF),后正中入路组20例行后路腰椎椎间融合术(posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF),记录两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间; 采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scal,VAS )、Oswestry功能障碍指数(oswestry disability index,ODI)评估两组患者手术后的临床疗效; 采用suk法评价两组患者术后椎间融合情况。结果 全部病例平均随访14个月。Wiltse入路组术中出血量为(130.5±16.5)mL、术后住院时间为(7±1.5)d,后正中入路组分别为(390.8±24.8)mL、(13±2.5)d,Wiltse入路组明显优于后正中入路组(P<0.05),两组患者术后腰痛、腿痛VAS评分和ODI均较术前明显降低,术后3个月及末次随访Wiltse入路组腰痛VAS评分和ODI均低于后正中入路组(P<0.05),腿痛VAS评分、椎间融合率、手术时间两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 经Wiltse入路与后正中入路治疗退变性腰椎间盘疾病均能达到满意的疗效,但Wiltse入路手术出血少,术后住院时间短,术后腰背痛残留率低,更好的解决了退变性腰椎间盘疾病患者的病痛。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical results of lumbar interbody fusion between Wiltse approach and traditional posterior approach in the treatment of one-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods 42 consecutive cases with single segmental lumbar degenerative disease underwent surgery intervention were prospective analyzed. Among them, 22 cases received minimally invasive operation(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)with self-made hook; 20 cases received open surgery(posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF).Operation time, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative ambulation time were recorded. VAS scale system and ODI were used to evaluate the low back pain and leg pain preoperatively and postoperatively respectively. The lumbar interbody fusion was assessed by the suk's method. Results Average follow-up was 14 months. Intraoperative bleeding, postoperative ambulation time, the minimally group was less than traditional group(P<0.05).Compared to preoperation, both the VAS of back leg pain and ODI in two groups improved significantly postoperatively. However, minimally group showed less back pain and ODI during the 3-month and the last follow up postoperatively(P<0.05), while there have no significant differences of VAS of leg pain, lumbar interbody fusion and operation time between minimally group and traditional group. Conclusion Mini-open TLIF by wiltse approach as well as open surgery PLIF can get satisfactory clinical outcome. Mini-open TLIF by wiltse approach has advantages as follows: less invasive, less intraoperative bleeding, earlier postoperative ambulation time, lower incidence of back pain in the duration of follow-up.

参考文献/References:

[1] 尹承慧, 符臣学, 徐皓,等. 腰椎手术失败综合征的再手术治疗[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2006,14(15):1127-1129.
[2] Bokov A, Isrelov A, Skorodumov A, et al. An analysis of reasons for failed back surgery syndrome and partial results after different types of surgical lumbar nerve root decompression [J]. Pain Physician,2011,14(6):545-557.
[3] Arts MP, Kols NI, Onderwater SM, et al. Clinical outcome of instrumented fusion for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome:a case series of 100 patients [J]. Acta Neurochir(Wien), 2012, 154(7):1213-217.
[4] Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability [J]. Neurosurgery, 2007, 60(4 Suppl 2):203-213.
[5] Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH,et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedical screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion [J]. Spine, 2000, 25(14):1843-1847.
[6] Wurgeler-HauriCC, Kallbarczyk A, wiesl M, et al.Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decom pression in acquined lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability [J].Spine,2008,33(3):66-72.
[7] 范顺武, 胡志军, 方向前.小切口与传统开放术式行后路腰椎椎体间融合术对脊旁肌损伤的对比研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(11):1000-1004.
[8] Tajima N, Chosa E, Watanabe S.Posterolateral lumbar fusion [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2004, 9(3):327-333.
[9] Wiltse LL,Bateman JG,Hutchinson RH,Nelson WE. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg,1968,50:919-926.
[10] 张锋,张文志,段丽群,等.Wiltse入路与传统后正中入路治疗胸腰段骨折疗效比较[J],颈腰痛杂志,2013,34(2):136-138.
[11] Park Y, Ha JW.Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach [J]. Spine, 2007, 32:537-543.
[12] 黎庆初,刘宝戈,金大地,等.多裂肌间隙入路微创手术治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(4):303-307.
[13] 毛克亚, 王岩, 肖嵩华,等. 微创手术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效评价[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(2):113-117.
[14] 黎庆初, 尹刚辉, 金大地,等. 微创Wiltse入路与传统后正中入路手术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(9):812-817.
[15] 武汉,姜睿. 椎旁肌间隙入路在胸腰椎手术中的临床应用[J]. 吉林大学学报:医学版,2010,36(5):975-978.

相似文献/References:

[1]肖献秋,芮小平,王 力,等.超声引导联合Encor真空辅助微创旋切系统治疗 乳腺良性肿块的临床疗效[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2019,(12):1265.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2019.12.018]
 XIAO Xianqiu,RUI Xiaoping,WANG Li,et al.Effect of Ultrasound Guidance Combined with Encor Minimally Invasive Biopsy System in the Treatment of Benign Breast Masses[J].Ningxia Medical University,2019,(09):1265.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2019.12.018]
[2]田少锋,张保云,王河君,等.微创软通道治疗高血压脑出血后颅内感染因素分析[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2015,(04):452.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2015.04.027]
[3]王玉伟,李新帅,徐政杰,等.超声引导微创旋切系统在乳腺病灶诊治中的临床应用[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2015,(05):598.[doi:10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2015.05.037 ]
[4]徐军,杜磊,买正军,等.半椎板开窗镜下微创切除椎管内偏侧髓外硬膜下肿瘤[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2014,(10):1175.
[5]菅云飞,王 波,沙玉霞,等.经皮扩张气管切开术在ICU的临床观察[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,(03):263.
 JIAN Yun-fei,WANG Bo,SHA Yu-xia,et al.The Application Research of Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy in ICU[J].Ningxia Medical University,2013,(09):263.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-05-22 基金项目:2012年宁夏科技攻关项目 作者简介:陈振(1985-),男,在读硕士研究生,研究方向:腰椎退变性疾病。E-mail:by05chenzhen@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-09-20